›Prosthetic material with higher risk of anastomotic involvement than native tissue
›Arteriovenous fistula — lowest risk
›Native tissue resists infection better than prosthetic or catheter material
›Empiric antibiotics — pending culture results
›Vancomycin for MRSA coverage
›20 mg/kg IV loading dose based on actual body weight
›Subsequent dosing guided by serum trough level or administered post-dialysis session per renal/pharmacy protocol
›Do not withhold MRSA coverage while awaiting the dialysis schedule
›Gram-negative coverage
›Cefepime 1 to 2 g IV, dosed for renal impairment and given post-dialysis when applicable
›Gentamicin 1 to 1.5 mg/kg IV as an alternative, dosed post-dialysis with level-guided redosing
›Narrow therapy once culture and sensitivity results available
›Cultures
›Paired samples from catheter hub or lumen and a separate peripheral vein
›Distinguishes catheter-associated bacteremia from contamination
›Peripheral cultures alone for fistula or graft infection without a catheter
›Catheter removal versus salvage
›Remove the catheter
›Tunnel or exit-site infection
›Hemodynamic instability or sepsis
›Persistent bacteremia beyond 72 hours of appropriate antibiotics
›Infection with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas species, or fungal organisms
›Evidence of metastatic infection — endocarditis, septic emboli, osteomyelitis
›Consider salvage with antibiotic lock therapy plus systemic antibiotics
›Uncomplicated bacteremia with a less virulent organism such as coagulase-negative staphylococci
›Clinical improvement within 48 to 72 hours
›No tunnel or exit-site infection
›Limited remaining vascular access sites favoring salvage attempt
›Nephrology involvement required for any removal or salvage decision
›Graft and fistula infection
›Graft infection typically requires partial or complete excision
›Especially with anastomotic involvement, given risk of mycotic pseudoaneurysm and hemorrhage
›Fistula infection managed with antibiotics and close surveillance
›Surgical excision reserved for abscess, necrosis, or failure to improve
›Recognition and urgency
›Loss of palpable thrill and audible bruit defines thrombosis
›Not immediately limb-threatening in the way arterial limb ischemia is
›Salvage success declines as thrombus organizes and endothelializes over time
›Best outcomes with declotting attempted within 24 to 48 hours of thrombosis onset
›Later attempts up to several days may still succeed at a lower rate
›Who to call
›Interventional radiology — percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, often first-line
›Vascular surgery — surgical thrombectomy with or without revision, or when percutaneous approach fails
›Local protocol determines primary operator
›ED management
›Do not attempt to manipulate, massage, or declot the access in the ED
›Systemic anticoagulation is not routine empiric therapy while awaiting thrombectomy
›Differs from arterial limb ischemia management
›Reserve anticoagulation for a separate independent indication
›Analgesia as needed
›Alternate vascular access or a temporary catheter arranged with nephrology if dialysis is due before salvage can occur
›Warning signs identified at dialysis
›Rising venous pressures during treatment
›Declining measured access blood flow on serial surveillance
›Prolonged bleeding after needle removal
›Bleeding lasting longer than 20 minutes after decannulation is abnormal
›Recirculation
›Venous-to-arterial needle recirculation from a downstream stenosis reduces effective dialysis clearance
›Detected by recirculation study or unexplained inadequate dialysis dose
›Difficulty with cannulation or new arm swelling
›Location
›Venous anastomosis in grafts
›Juxta-anastomotic segment in fistulas
›Both from neointimal hyperplasia driven by turbulent shear stress
›Management
›Balloon angioplasty first-line therapy
›Stent placement reserved for elastic recoil, recurrent stenosis within 3 months, or a surgically inaccessible lesion
›Urgent but not emergent referral unless thrombosis has occurred
Steal Syndrome and Ischemic Monomelic Neuropathy Management
›Steal syndrome management by stage
›Stage I
›Observation and reassurance
›Reassess at routine dialysis and follow-up
›Stage II
›Conservative measures with close monitoring
›Consider elective revision if symptoms progress
›Stage III and IV
›Urgent surgical revision required
›Banding to reduce access flow
›Distal revascularization-interval ligation procedure
›Revision using distal inflow procedure
›Access ligation as a last resort to preserve the limb when other revisions are not feasible
›Ischemic monomelic neuropathy — emergency not to miss
›Distinguish from classic steal
›Onset within hours of access creation or revision, not gradual
›Pulses and skin perfusion often preserved despite severe symptoms
›Pain and motor or sensory deficit are disproportionate to any visible ischemia
›Higher risk in patients with pre-existing peripheral neuropathy, particularly diabetics
›Immediate action
›Emergent vascular surgery consultation
›Urgent access ligation within hours to prevent permanent nerve injury
›Do not observe or defer — delay risks irreversible nerve damage
Aneurysm and Pseudoaneurysm Management
›Distinguishing features
›True aneurysm — fusiform dilation of all layers of the fistula wall
›Repeated same-site needle punctures or post-stenotic dilation
›Pseudoaneurysm — contained leak through the vessel or graft wall
›Usually graft-associated, contained by surrounding scar rather than vessel wall
›Skin changes predicting imminent rupture
›Thinning, shiny, or ulcerated skin overlying the mass
›Spontaneous oozing or bleeding
›Rapid enlargement on serial exam
›Loss of skin coverage or dusky discoloration
›Management
›Any impending-rupture skin change — emergent vascular surgery evaluation
›Immediate cessation of cannulation through the affected segment
›Stable aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm without skin compromise
›Outpatient vascular surgery referral for elective repair
›Continued cannulation elsewhere on the access if segment remains usable
Central Venous Stenosis Management
›Recognition
›Ipsilateral arm, neck, or facial swelling with a patent peripheral access
›Chest wall venous collaterals on exam
›Higher risk after prior subclavian catheterization than internal jugular catheterization
›Diagnosis
›Venography is the gold standard
›Duplex ultrasound of the peripheral access does not exclude central disease
›Management
›Angioplasty first-line for symptomatic central venous stenosis
›Stent placement for elastic recoil or recurrent stenosis
›Surgical bypass reserved for cases failing endovascular therapy
›Avoid subclavian vein catheterization for any future line placement in patients who may need future dialysis access
Missed Dialysis Presentation
›Recognition
›Confirm date and time of last dialysis session and number of sessions missed
›Assess for hyperkalemia and fluid overload symptoms and ECG changes
›Management
›Full hyperkalemia treatment per the Hyperkalemia protocol
›Full fluid overload and pulmonary edema treatment per the Acute Pulmonary Edema protocol
›Access-specific considerations
›Emergent dialysis uses the patient's existing fistula or graft, cannulated only by trained dialysis staff
›A new temporary catheter placed by trained personnel if the existing access is not usable or available
›The existing access is not for routine ED blood draws or fluids even during this presentation
›Early nephrology involvement to coordinate emergent dialysis timing and access use