›Do not treat varicocele pain with antibiotics
›Antibiotic selection guided by STI risk and age if epididymitis confirmed
Varicocele repair indications
›AUA/ASRM criteria for repair
›Infertility indication
›Palpable varicocele
›Plus documented infertility
›Plus abnormal semen parameters
›Female partner with normal or surgically correctable fertility
›Class I recommendation per AUA/ASRM Guideline Part II 2021
›Cochrane 2021 systematic review supports treatment benefit in subfertile men
›Pain indication
›Symptomatic varicocele refractory to conservative measures
›No specific grading required
›Urology to confirm diagnosis and confirm no alternative cause
›Adolescent indication
›Ipsilateral testicular volume loss greater than or equal to 20% asymmetry
›Or abnormal semen analysis
›Urology referral for individualized decision
›Contraindications to varicocele repair
›Subclinical varicocele
›Non-palpable varicocele found incidentally on imaging
›No evidence of benefit; AUA/ASRM Guideline Part II 2021
›Normal semen parameters
›Repair does not further improve fertility in men with normal semen
›Watchful waiting appropriate
›Isolated teratozoospermia
›Abnormal morphology alone is not a sufficient indication
›AUA/ASRM Guideline Part II 2021
›Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy
›Gold standard surgical approach
›Lowest recurrence rate approximately 1%
›Lowest hydrocele and arterial injury complication rates
›Technical requirements
›Requires intraoperative optical magnification
›Identification and preservation of testicular artery and lymphatics
›Expected outcomes
›Improvement in semen parameters in majority of treated patients
›Spontaneous pregnancy rates improve post-repair
›Time to improvement in semen parameters approximately 3 to 6 months
›Inguinal microsurgical approach
›Similar outcomes to subinguinal approach
›Slightly higher ligation point
›Preferred in some centers based on surgeon expertise
›Recurrence and complication rates comparable to subinguinal
›Takacs et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2025 review
›Laparoscopic varicocelectomy
›Minimally invasive option
›Higher recurrence than microsurgical approaches
›General anesthesia required
›May be preferred for bilateral repair
›Single abdominal access point
›Not first-line due to higher recurrence
›Percutaneous embolization
›Minimally invasive radiological alternative
›Comparable efficacy to surgical approaches in eligible patients
›Local or sedation anesthesia acceptable
›Technique
›Catheter-directed coil or sclerosant embolization of internal spermatic vein
›Performed by interventional radiology
›Preferred in recurrent or persistent varicocele post-surgical repair
›Spermatic venography guides catheter placement
›Fertility and Sterility Committee Opinion 2014