›Performance
›FAINT score 0: 96.7% sensitivity and 98.8% NPV for serious cardiac outcome
›2026 JAMA Network Open US validation study
›San Francisco Syncope Rule
›Five criteria
›Abnormal ECG
›Hematocrit below 30%
›CHF history
›Shortness of breath
›SBP below 90 mmHg
›Performance
›Sensitivity 87% for serious outcomes
›Limited specificity reduces utility for discharge decisions
›Risk stratification framework
›High-risk features requiring admission
›Any high-risk ECG finding
›Known structural heart disease
›SBP below 90 mmHg on presentation
›Syncope during exertion or while supine
›Family history of SCD under age 50
›Elevated troponin or BNP
›2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines Class I admission indications
›Serious medical condition potentially relevant to syncope identified
›Documented arrhythmia as cause requiring treatment
›Syncope with hemodynamic instability or significant injury
Scoring Systems for arrhythmia detection
›ECG high-risk pattern recognition
›AV block findings
›Mobitz type II: dropped QRS after fixed PR; high risk, pacing required
›Third-degree AV block: complete dissociation of P and QRS
›Alternating LBBB and RBBB: severe conduction system disease
›Channelopathy patterns
›Brugada Type 1: coved ST elevation V1-V2 with inverted T waves
›Long QT: QTc above 470 ms in males or above 480 ms in females
›Epsilon waves and T-wave inversions V1 to V3 suggest ARVC
›Short PR with delta wave indicates WPW
›Ischemia and LV pathology
›Q waves or acute ST changes indicate ACS
›LVH voltage criteria suggests HCM or hypertensive disease
›Bifascicular block carries risk of intermittent complete heart block
›Bradycardia findings
›Sinus bradycardia below 40 bpm
›Sinus pauses greater than 3 seconds indicating sick sinus syndrome
›Cardiac MRI indications
›Structural and myocardial assessment
›Evaluation for HCM, ARVC, or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
›Late gadolinium enhancement for fibrosis and scar mapping
›Assessment of LVEF and regional wall motion abnormalities
›ARVC diagnosis
›RV morphology, fat infiltration, and regional dysfunction
›Task force criteria support for ARVC diagnosis
›Sensitivity for ARVC higher than echocardiography
›When to use
›Unexplained syncope with normal or non-diagnostic echo
›Suspected myocarditis or infiltrative cardiomyopathy
›Family history of channelopathy or SCD without clear diagnosis
›Limitations
›Limited availability in acute ED setting
›Pacemaker or ICD may be contraindication
›Requires stable patient and expertise in interpretation
›CT coronary angiography
›Indications
›Suspected coronary artery disease as syncope trigger
›Low to intermediate pretest probability for obstructive CAD
›Radiation and contrast exposure considerations
›Performance
›High sensitivity and specificity for obstructive CAD
›Useful when functional stress testing not feasible
›Limitations
›Does not assess arrhythmia substrate
›Requires beta-blockade for optimal image quality
›CT pulmonary angiography
›Indications
›Syncope with suspected massive PE
›Tachycardia, hypoxia, and pleuritic chest pain constellation
›Use Wells or Geneva score to guide ordering
›Performance
›Near 100% sensitivity for central PE when performed correctly
›Negative predictive value sufficient to exclude PE in intermediate-low risk
›CT aorta
›Indications
›Syncope with tearing chest or back pain
›Pulse or blood pressure asymmetry between limbs
›Suspected aortic dissection or aortic aneurysm
›Sensitivity and specificity near 100% for Type A and B aortic dissection
›Point-of-care echocardiography
›Immediate structural assessment
›LVEF and global systolic function
›RV size and function for PE assessment
›Pericardial effusion and tamponade physiology
›Valvular assessment
›Aortic valve calcification and stenosis gradient estimation
›Mitral valve pathology
›IVC assessment
›Collapsibility index for volume status
›Plethoric IVC in tamponade or RV failure
›Formal echocardiography
›Indications
›All patients with unexplained syncope and suspected structural disease
›Assessment of LVEF for ICD decision-making
›Doppler gradients across aortic or mitral valve
›Performance
›LVEF under 35% identifies high-risk ICD candidates
›Severe AS peak gradient above 40 mmHg confirms critical stenosis
›Limitations
›Does not capture paroxysmal arrhythmias
›Acoustic windows limited in obese or COPD patients