›Observation; ICD not routinely indicated
›Cardiac MRI indications in BrS evaluation
›ARVC exclusion
›Fibrofatty replacement of RV myocardium supports ARVC over BrS
›Task Force Criteria for ARVC include MRI-defined RV abnormalities
›RVOT structural assessment
›Emerging evidence of subtle RVOT structural abnormalities in BrS
›Not routinely required for diagnosis
›Myocarditis evaluation
›Late gadolinium enhancement supports inflammatory cause of Brugada phenocopy
›T2 signal elevation in acute myocarditis
›Protocol considerations
›Gadolinium contrast administration
›Required for late gadolinium enhancement assessment
›Contraindicated in severe renal impairment (eGFR <30)
›ICD compatibility
›Conditional MRI-safe ICD required if device already implanted
›Confirm device MRI compatibility before scanning
›CT chest indications
›Mediastinal mass or tumor exclusion
›RVOT compression as Brugada phenocopy
›Lymphoma or other mediastinal mass
›Pulmonary embolism exclusion
›CT pulmonary angiography if PE suspected
›CTPA sensitivity approximately 83%, specificity approximately 96% for PE
›Pectus excavatum assessment
›CT chest defines degree of cardiac compression
›Haller index calculated from CT
›Coronary CT angiography
›ACS exclusion when clinical picture ambiguous
›High-sensitivity troponin first; CCTA for intermediate risk
›Coronary artery anatomy typically normal in BrS
›Echocardiography
›First-line structural assessment
›Typically normal in BrS; structurally normal heart expected
›LVEF and RV function assessment
›ARVC exclusion
›RV dilatation, wall motion abnormalities, aneurysm
›Fatty infiltration not reliably detected by echo; MRI preferred
›Pericardial effusion
›Myocarditis or pericarditis phenocopy assessment
›RVOT dimensions
›Enlarged RVOT may support ARVC or structural phenocopy
›Point-of-care ultrasound in the ED
›Rapid global function assessment
›Exclude obvious structural cause of ST elevation
›Pericardial effusion detection
›IVC assessment
›Volume status assessment if hemodynamic compromise present
Electrocardiographic studies
›Standard 12-lead ECG
›Type 1 Brugada pattern (diagnostic)
›Coved-type ST elevation ≥2 mm in V1 or V2
›Followed by negative T wave without isoelectric interval
›Highest intercostal lead placement increases sensitivity
›Type 2 pattern (not diagnostic alone)
›Saddle-back ST elevation ≥0.5 mm in V1 or V2
›Requires confirmatory testing
›Sodium channel blocker provocation test
›Indications
›Suspected BrS without spontaneous type 1 pattern
›Asymptomatic relative with family history of BrS or SCD
›Agents
›Ajmaline 1 mg/kg IV over 10 minutes (preferred in Europe)
›Flecainide 2 mg/kg IV over 10 minutes (max 150 mg)
›Procainamide 10 mg/kg IV over 10 minutes (alternative)
›Monitoring requirements
›Continuous 12-lead ECG during and 30 min post-infusion
›Resuscitation equipment immediately available
›Test stopped if type 1 pattern, PVCs, VT, QRS >130% baseline
›Holter monitoring
›Intermittent type 1 pattern detection
›Nocturnal ST changes during vagotonic periods
›Spontaneous PVCs or runs of polymorphic VT
›Ambulatory arrhythmia burden
›AF detection (associated with BrS in subset)
›Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS)
›Role remains controversial
›Class IIb for asymptomatic patients with spontaneous type 1
›Specificity decreases with triple extrastimuli protocol
›Not routinely recommended for risk stratification in most guidelines
›Performed by electrophysiology
›In-patient procedure under monitoring