›Residual deficits
›50 to 73% of survivors develop permanent neurological sequelae
›Cognitive impairment
›Motor weakness
›Movement disorders
›Prolonged recovery in majority
›Hospitalization rate approximately 91% in case series
›Virus characteristics
›Flavivirus family member
›Single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus
›Related to West Nile virus dengue and Zika virus
›Only tick-borne encephalitis flavivirus endemic to North America
›Two lineages
›Lineage I prototype POWV maintained in groundhog-Ixodes cookei cycle
›Lineage II deer tick virus maintained in Ixodes scapularis cycle
›Lineage II accounts for most human cases in modern era
›Transmission and incubation
›Tick to human transmission
›Can occur within as little as 15 minutes of tick attachment
›Unlike Lyme disease requiring 36 to 72 hours for significant transmission
›Brief attachment significantly reduces prevention window
›Incubation period 1 to 4 weeks
›Median time from exposure to symptom onset approximately 1 to 3 weeks
›Longer incubation obscures tick exposure history
›Neurotropism and CNS injury
›Entry into CNS
›Viremia followed by hematogenous seeding of brain
›Blood-brain barrier disruption
›Possible retrograde axonal transport
›Target regions
›Basal ganglia thalami most commonly involved
›Brainstem and cerebellum in rhombencephalitis pattern
›Cerebral cortex and hippocampus
›Anterior horn cells causing myelitis
›Immune response
›Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate
›Neuronal apoptosis and necrosis
›Glial activation and inflammatory cytokine production
›Immune-mediated injury may exceed direct viral injury
Therapeutic Considerations
›No specific antiviral therapy approved
›Supportive care remains standard of treatment
›No controlled trials of antivirals for POWV
›Ribavirin and interferon lack efficacy data
›Investigational flavivirus inhibitors in preclinical stages
›Clinical trial participation
›Refer to ClinicalTrials.gov for active studies
›Compassionate use or expanded access protocols for novel agents
›Immunosuppression management
›B-cell depleting therapies as major risk factor
›Rituximab impairs antibody-mediated clearance
›Serological diagnosis unreliable in B-cell depleted patients
›RT-PCR preferred over serology in immunocompromised
›Hold or modify immunosuppression
›In consultation with rheumatology or transplant medicine
›Balance infection severity against underlying disease
›Corticosteroid evidence
›Case reports of benefit in rhombencephalitis
›Potential anti-inflammatory effect in severe edema
›No randomized controlled data
›Decision individualized based on clinical severity
›Contraindication consideration
›May impair viral clearance
›Avoid until bacterial meningitis excluded
›Diagnostic access challenges
›Limited commercial laboratory availability
›CDC and state reference laboratories primary testing sites
›Testing delays common due to referral requirement
›Metagenomic next-generation sequencing
›Emerging diagnostic tool for POWV and other rare pathogens
›Particularly useful in immunocompromised with negative standard testing
›Available at select academic centers and commercial labs
›Plaque reduction neutralization test
›Required to confirm and distinguish from cross-reactive flaviviruses
›Reference laboratory only
›Results may take days to weeks
›Prevention strategies
›No vaccine available for POWV
›Unlike European tick-borne encephalitis which has approved vaccines
›Tick-bite prevention is only effective strategy
›DEET and permethrin
›DEET 20 to 30% on skin for 8 hours of protection
›Permethrin on clothing and gear for tick repulsion
›CDC recommended preventive measures
›Daily tick checks
›Full body examination after outdoor activity
›Prompt tick removal reduces transmission risk for most tick diseases
›Very brief attachment window for POWV means prevention is critical
›No post-exposure prophylaxis available after tick bite
›Observation for symptom development
›Medical evaluation for fever or neurological symptoms after exposure