›Obligate intracellular protozoan parasite
›Three main life stages: tachyzoites, bradyzoites (cysts), oocysts
›Definitive host: cats (sexual cycle)
›Intermediate hosts: warm-blooded mammals including humans
›Primary maternal infection mechanism
›Ingestion of oocysts from cat feces or contaminated soil
›Ingestion of tissue cysts in undercooked meat
›Tachyzoites disseminate hematogenously
›Placental and fetal infection
›Tachyzoites cross placenta during maternal parasitemia
›Placental infection precedes fetal infection
›First trimester: placenta relatively impermeable but fetal infection more severe
›Third trimester: placenta more permeable, higher fetal transmission
›Mechanisms of organ damage
›Direct cellular destruction
›Tachyzoites lyse host cells as they replicate
›CNS neurons, retinal cells, hepatocytes, myocytes affected
›Immune-mediated injury
›Inflammatory response to parasite antigens
›Contributes to retinal scarring in chorioretinitis
›CNS calcifications
›Areas of necrosis calcify
›Diffuse distribution reflects hematogenous seeding
›Hydrocephalus mechanism
›Aqueductal obstruction from periventricular inflammation
›CSF flow obstruction from ependymitis
Therapeutic Considerations
›Treatment evidence base
›Pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine combination
›Synergistic inhibition of Toxoplasma folate synthesis
›Pyrimethamine inhibits dihydrofolate reductase
›Sulfadiazine inhibits dihydropteroate synthase
›Most studied and recommended regimen
›12-month treatment duration rationale
›Eliminates active tachyzoites and suppresses tissue cysts
›Prevents new retinochoroidal lesions
›National Collaborative Study demonstrated benefit of full 12-month course
›Leucovorin co-administration rationale
›Bypasses the folate synthesis step blocked by pyrimethamine
›Protects human cells from folate depletion
›Toxoplasma cannot utilize exogenous leucovorin (parasite selectivity)
›Unresolved management questions
›TMP-SMX vs pyrimethamine-sulfadiazine comparison
›Emerging evidence for cotrimoxazole as better-tolerated alternative
›Less bone marrow suppression potential
›Head-to-head trials limited
›Optimal duration in asymptomatic infants
›12-month course recommended regardless of symptom status
›Evidence strongest for symptomatic infants
›Screening program effectiveness
›Universal neonatal screening not implemented in US
›Targeted screening in high-risk populations
›Austrian and French models show benefit of prenatal screening
›Prevention strategies
›Primary prevention counseling for seronegative pregnant women
›Avoid raw and undercooked meat
›Avoid cat litter box handling
›Handwashing after gardening
›Wash fruits and vegetables
›Secondary prevention: prenatal serologic screening
›Monthly IgG in seronegative women in endemic areas
›Immediate treatment initiation on seroconversion