›Ottawa Foot Rules
›Imaging indicated when any criterion met
›Midfoot bone tenderness at navicular or cuboid
›Inability to bear weight for 4 steps in ED
›Validated to reduce unnecessary radiography
›Sensitivity for midfoot fracture approaches 100%
›Specificity approximately 40%
›ACEP Level B recommendation for application of Ottawa rules
›Fenton Classification of Cuboid Fractures
›Type 1: simple avulsion at calcaneocuboid joint capsule
›Most common pattern, 48.4% of cases
›Conservative management appropriate
›Type 2: isolated extra-articular body fracture
›13% of cases
›Usually amenable to non-operative care
›Type 3: intra-articular body fracture
›6.8% of cases
›Articular congruity assessment essential
›Type 4: associated midfoot or tarsometatarsal disruption
›18.2% of cases
›Surgical stabilization typically required
›Type 5: mid-tarsal joint disruption with lateral column crush (nutcracker)
›13.5% of cases
›Bone grafting often required to restore lateral column length
›MRI indications for cuboid fracture
›Occult fracture after negative radiographs with clinical suspicion
›Most sensitive modality for marrow edema
›Demonstrates stress fractures not visible on plain film
›Associated soft tissue and ligamentous injury characterization
›Peroneus longus tendon integrity
›Calcaneocuboid ligament disruption
›ACR Appropriateness Criteria
›MRI without contrast is usually appropriate for suspected occult fracture when radiographs are normal or equivocal
›Equivalent to CT as alternative when both available
›MRI findings in cuboid fractures
›Bone marrow edema
›T2 and STIR hyperintensity in cuboid
›Confirms stress reaction or occult fracture
›Fracture line
›Low signal intensity on T1 and T2
›Confirms acute fracture
›Pediatric cuboid fractures
›90% had negative initial radiographs in one series
›MRI demonstrated fractures not seen on plain film
›Protocol and limitations
›MRI without contrast is standard
›Gadolinium not required for acute fracture
›Contrast if infection or tumor suspected
›Limitations
›Availability and time constraints in acute setting
›Motion artifact in pediatric patients
›CT indications
›Fracture characterization when radiographs are positive
›Extent of displacement and comminution
›Articular step-off measurement
›Negative radiographs with high clinical suspicion
›ACR criteria: CT or MRI appropriate as equivalents
›Essential for surgical planning
›Preoperative planning
›3D reconstruction for complex fractures
›Calcaneocuboid joint involvement delineation
›CT findings
›Lateral column shortening
›Nutcracker fracture pattern identification
›Bone loss requiring graft planning
›Articular step-off quantification
›> 1 mm displacement is surgical threshold
›Calcaneocuboid joint congruity assessment
›Comminution pattern
›Number and size of fragments
›Guides fixation strategy
›CT protocol
›CT foot without contrast
›1 mm slice thickness for bone detail
›Coronal and sagittal reconstructions
›Exclude contrast unless infection suspected
›Renal function assessment before contrast if used
›Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) role
›Fracture detection adjunct at bedside
›Cortical disruption visible on high-frequency linear probe
›Sensitivity for occult fractures lower than MRI or CT
›Soft tissue assessment
›Peroneal tendon subluxation or tear
›Hematoma characterization
›Ultrasound-guided procedures
›Hematoma block for analgesia
›Sterile technique
›Local anesthetic instilled at fracture site
›Aspiration of tense hematoma for pain relief
›Uncommon but may be considered
›Limitations
›Operator-dependent accuracy
›Bone anatomy complexity limits visualization
›CT or MRI preferred for definitive diagnosis
›Not adequate for surgical planning
›CT required for fracture pattern characterization before ORIF