›Equivocal clinical presentation when diagnosis uncertain
›Partial FDP tears where active DIP flexion is diminished but not absent
›Characterizes extent of tendon retraction with precision
›Delayed presentations
›Assess tendon viability and sheath integrity beyond 2-3 weeks
›Tendon quality guides reconstruction versus arthrodesis decision
›Preoperative planning for complex reconstructions
›Sheath obliteration assessment
›Myostatic contracture degree
›MRI protocol considerations
›Dedicated hand or finger coil required
›Small field of view for high-resolution imaging
›Sagittal and axial sequences essential
›T1 and T2 sequences
›T2 demonstrates oedema, sheath fluid, and tendon retraction level
›T1 shows tendon morphology and gap length
›Contraindications
›Metallic implants from prior hand surgery
›Patient unable to cooperate with positioning
›CT indications for jersey finger
›Fracture characterization
›Comminuted distal phalanx fractures in Type V injuries
›Fragment size and location for surgical planning
›Preoperative planning for complex bony avulsions
›3D reconstruction for ORIF planning
›Joint surface involvement assessment
›When radiographs are equivocal for fragment detection
›Non-displaced small avulsion fragments may be radiographically occult
›CT limitations
›Soft tissue resolution inferior to MRI for tendon assessment
›Does not characterize tendon retraction level or viability
›Use MRI when tendon detail is the primary question
›Radiation exposure consideration in young patients
›Finger CT radiation dose is low but should be clinically justified
›Ultrasound for preoperative tendon localization
›Cost-effective identification of tendon retraction level
›Comparable to MRI for classifying injury type in experienced hands
›Real-time dynamic assessment of tendon continuity
›Can identify location of tendon stump
›Palm versus PIP versus DIP level retraction
›Guides decision for incision planning
›Point-of-care ultrasound feasible in the ED
›Linear high-frequency probe 10-15 MHz
›Longitudinal view of flexor tendon from palm to fingertip
›Ultrasound technique
›Scan from palm to distal phalanx
›Identify tendon gap and retracted stump as hyperechoic structure
›Peritendinous haematoma appears as hypoechoic fluid
›Dynamic assessment with passive DIP flexion
›Absence of tendon movement at insertion confirms avulsion
›Operator experience affects diagnostic accuracy
›Sensitivity and specificity highest with dedicated musculoskeletal ultrasound expertise
›Radiograph as first-line imaging
›Three-view finger radiographs AP, lateral, and oblique
›May show volar avulsion fracture fragment at base of distal phalanx
›Fragment location helps classify injury type
›Normal in pure tendon avulsions without bony fragment (Type I)
›Imaging should not delay referral if clinical exam is diagnostic