›MRI reserved for specific circumstances
›Indications for MRI over CT
›Contrast allergy where CT urogram contraindicated
›Radiation concern in pediatric or pregnant patients
›Characterization of equivocal renal lesion found on CT
›MRI findings in renal contusion
›Focal T2 hyperintensity in renal parenchyma
›Corresponds to edema and bruising
›No disruption of cortical outline
›No collecting system involvement
›Intact Gerota's fascia signal
›Absence of perirenal T2 bright fluid collections
›MRI limitations
›Not recommended for acute trauma triage
›Longer acquisition time
›Limited availability in emergency setting
›Motion artifact degrades image quality
›Requires cooperative patient
›Breath-hold sequences needed
›CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast
›Gold standard for renal trauma evaluation
›Sensitivity > 98% for significant renal injury
›ACS Best Practices Guidelines support CT as primary modality
›Indications for CT in renal trauma
›Gross hematuria regardless of mechanism
›Microhematuria with hemodynamic instability (SBP < 90 mmHg)
›Additional CT indications
›High-energy mechanism (fall > 3 m, high-speed MVC)
›Flank ecchymosis or lower rib fractures
›Clinical suspicion despite absence of hematuria
›CT protocol for renal trauma
›Triple-phase imaging recommended
›Arterial phase: vascular injury and active extravasation
›Portal venous phase: parenchymal injury assessment
›Delayed urographic phase (10-15 minutes)
›Collecting system integrity assessment
›Contrast extravasation into retroperitoneum identifies UPJ or ureter disruption
›CT findings in renal contusion (Grade I)
›Focal or diffuse decreased parenchymal enhancement
›Bruising without laceration
›Small subcapsular hematoma possible
›No contrast extravasation
›Collecting system intact
›Gerota's fascia intact
›When CT may be omitted
›Microhematuria alone without hemodynamic instability
›Low-energy mechanism
›ACR Appropriateness Criteria supports selective CT in minor blunt trauma
›Shared decision-making with urology
›EAST Practice Management Guideline 2023 framework
›Intraoperative IVP
›Reserved for unstable patients taken to OR without CT
›Single-shot at 10 minutes post IV contrast bolus
›Confirms contralateral kidney function before nephrectomy
›E-FAST examination
›Role in renal trauma triage
›Effective for detecting free intra-abdominal fluid
›Low sensitivity for renal parenchymal injury specifically
›Perinephric free fluid on E-FAST
›Raises suspicion for retroperitoneal hemorrhage
›Negative E-FAST does not exclude significant renal injury
›POCUS limitations in renal trauma
›Cannot reliably grade renal injury
›Cannot visualize collecting system integrity
›Cannot assess vascular pedicle
›Not recommended as primary diagnostic tool for renal trauma
›ACS guidelines and SIR position statement support CT over ultrasound
›WSES-AAST guidelines concur
›Ultrasound utility in follow-up
›Serial ultrasound for evolving perirenal hematoma
›Non-radiation follow-up option in stable patients
›Less accurate than CT for detailed characterization
›Urinoma monitoring
›Developing fluid collection post-injury
›Doppler assessment of renal perfusion